The erotiche plato erotice socratesFBI quietly developed a facial recognition network that allows law enforcement to identify people in the United States without their knowledge.
Now lawmakers want to know why the agency didn't tell people about it.
SEE ALSO: This creepy Facebook stalking app was a hoax—but it should still scare the hell out of you"Why did the FBI not fulfill the requirement of the law?" asked House Oversight Committee chairman Jason Chaffetz at a hearing on Wednesday.
The FBI didn't let citizens know the agency was collecting photos from motor vehicle departments, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office. And a lotof people can be found on law enforcement facial recognition networks -- around half of American adults, according to a study from Georgetown University's Center on Privacy and Technology.
At the hearing, House members hit on a bunch of topics with Kimberly Del Greco, the FBI's deputy assistant director of the Criminal Justice Information Services Division.
Here are three of the most alarming issues from the hearing.
Elijah Cummings, a Democrat from Maryland who lives in Baltimore, was more than a little worried about the Georgetown study, which showed facial recognition was less accurate when trying to identify black people.
“If you’re black, you’re more likely to be subjected to this technology, and the technology is more likely to be wrong," he said. "That’s a hell of a combination.”
Chaffetz was angry that the FBI didn't disclose its program to the public, but he seemed OK with it being used to single out undocumented immigrants. His comments from early in the hearing, via Gizmodo:
"The technology will also show us, the statistical data will show us, the bigger the database, the more difficult it is for the facial recognition technology to get it right. If the database was smaller to known criminals, wanted criminals, people that are here illegally, maybe those are the types of things that we should be focused on."
Rep. Paul Mitchell, a Republican from Michigan, seemed personally offended by the lack of disclosure.
"I wasn't informed that when my driver's license was renewed, my photograph was going to be in a repository that could be searched by law enforcement across the country," he said.
Rep. John Duncan worried the U.S. was becoming a "federal police state," but he needn't have mentioned "federal." Major local police departments are already using the technology. Some are exploring "real time" facial recognition synced with surveillance cameras.
Overall, several representatives felt this was the number one problem: the FBI didn't really tell anyone they were using facial recognition. The Department of Justice created a "privacy impact assessment" in 2008 and is legally required to update the assessment "whenever agencies develop technologies that collect personal information," according to the GAO report. That didn't happen.
Despite the outrage in Congress today, one of the hearing's conclusions was that the FBI will "continue to pursue" what's called a "memorandum of understanding" with motor vehicle departments across the country to add driver's license photos to their database.
They've already obtained such understandings with 18 states.
Topics Cybersecurity Facial Recognition Privacy
Special edition of Kia's electric EV6 announced with AR display and 300Here's how to apply for Twitter account verificationPeople discuss the silliest things they would die on a hill forFlush with bitcoin, hacker group behind Colonial Pipeline attack says it's doneBackstreet Boys' Nick Carter accused of sexual assault by former teen pop starSee the colossal James Webb space telescope unfurl its huge mirrorsThe proposal to do away with net neutrality is worse than you thinkThank God Trump is insulting American citizens on Twitter, I guessAll the times Donald Trump has gotten upset about Time's 'person of the year'Pixar chief and 'Toy Story' creator John Lasseter taking leaveTrump says he turned down Time's 'Person of the Year,' and no one's buying itSee the grim climate change graphs just restored to the EPA websiteTwitter eyes $2.99 subscription service, according to datamined codeTwitter launches new account verification applicationGoogle IO 2021: Google's turning the phone camera into a dermatologistCheeky seal gets chased away by weary fishmonger, goes viralUma Thurman responds to Harvey Weinstein sexual harassment scandalEverything coming to Netflix in June 2021IFA Berlin tech show canceled, will return in 2022Google Pixel 6 leak reveals radical redesign NYT mini crossword answers for April 30, 2025 Trump's new automotive tariff exemption benefits Tesla Apps on Google Play dropped by almost half [April 2025] Best Lego deal: Save $10 on Lego Botanicals Orchid Best Amazon deal: Get the FlexiSpot Standing Desk for just $95 25 TikTok, YouTube and Instagram creators who made it to TV, movies Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K deal: Get 40% off Best vacuum deal: Save $70 on the Bissell Crosswave Pet Pro Best monitor deal: Get the 32 Best smartwatch deal: Get the Google Pixel Watch 3 for $50 off NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for May 1: Tips to solve Connections #220 Get the official Atari 7800+ Console for 50% off Makeup influencer Samantha Harvey's tips on becoming a full Best Fitbit deal: Save $40 on Fitbit Charge 6 Best Disney+ deals and bundles: Best streaming deals in May 2025 CES Alienware Area 51 desktop deal: $500 off Samsung 990 EVO Plus 1TB SSD deal: Get 36% off Elon Musk's X lost 11 million users in the EU over the past 5 months Best Mother's Day gift: The Kodak Mini 2 Retro photo printer is under $75 Sabalenka vs. Kostyuk 2025 livestream: Watch Madrid Open for free
2.0453s , 10195.8515625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【erotiche plato erotice socrates】,Creation Information Network