【Porno (1981) full movie in english subtitles】

Warning: As you might expect,Porno (1981) full movie in english subtitles this post assumes you've seenThe Last Jedi. Do not read on if you don't want to see spoilers.

One common fear of Star Wars fans on the way to seeing The Last Jedi was this: that director Rian Johnson would simply cover roughly the same ground as Empire Strikes Back.

One common fear of shellshocked Star Wars fans on the way out of The Last Jediwas this: woah, did Johnson just cover toomuch ground? More than Empireand Return of the Jedi combined? Is there anything left in the sequel trilogy's story bank for Episode IX?

SEE ALSO: 'The Last Jedi' destroyed me and I am not OK: How to process the big surprise

The trilogy's plan, in as much as it had one, appears to have been that each movie would focus on and wrap up the story of each of the three main leads.

First came The Force Awakens, which focused on and wrapped up Han Solo's story. It kept Leia in the background, and deliberately didn't give Luke a single word -- because he was the movie's MacGuffin.

Then came The Last Jedi, which focused on and (sob!) wrapped up Luke Skywalker's story. Leia was brought closer to the foreground, and survived, but it still wasn't her movie; hers was to be Episode IX. Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy has said in no uncertain terms that this is no longer the plan.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

So how will Episode IX explain the absence of Leia? And how will it deal with other major questions that arise from Rian Johnson's break-all-the-things approach to The Last Jedi?

The script for Episode IX is currently being written by director J.J. Abrams and screenwriter Chris Terrio in advance of an expected mid-2018 filming. That means the definitive answers likely don't even exist yet. But here are some suggestions of how the upcoming film might deal with them.

Problem #1: Leia's farewell

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Given the beautifully-handled revelation of Leia Organa's Mary Poppins-like Force powers in The Last Jedi, we can only imagine how she might have exercised them in Episode IX had Carrie Fisher lived.

But that's off the cards now, and the movie will somehow have to explain Leia's absence. She's so central to the Resistance at this point in the narrative, you can't ignore the question of what happened to her. No endless space vacation seems possible after that ending, and CGI trickery has been ruled out; Leia must have passed away between the movies.

That means our heroes would seem a little callous if we don't see them grieving in some way -- preferably en masse, as that would also give us a sense of the overmatched Resistance remnants.

So in the absence of an actual death scene, here's one way to do it: open on Leia's funeral or memorial service.

We've had four funerals so far in Star Wars; it's actually something of a tradition for the franchise. First came Luke's sorrowful funeral pyre for Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker at the end of Return of the Jedi, then an echo of that scene in a pyre for Jedi master Qui-Gon Jinn at the end of The Phantom Menace.

Attack of the Clones gave us the funderal of Anakin's mom, and last the somber parade for Leia's mother, Padme Amidala, at the end of Revenge of the Sith. Three out of these four scenes worked well, becoming some of the most emotional moments of their respective films.

Putting a memorial service near the beginningof a Star Wars movie would be a first, but it would serve a number of purposes. It would officially recognize the outsize importance of Leia to the Rebellion, the Resistance and the franchise as a whole. It would be a great setting to check in with all our heroes as they establish the stakes for Episode IX.

And it would help inoculate Abrams against a charge that clung to him after The Force Awakens-- that he's simply retreading what has gone before. Especially if he combines this scene with one that solves ...

Mashable Top Stories Stay connected with the hottest stories of the day and the latest entertainment news. Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletter By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Problem #2: Snoke

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Darkness rises, and the light to meet it, as Supreme Leader Snoke said before his untimely death.

Star Wars is, increasingly, all about the balance between the two. So if you're having a memorial service for the lost leader of the Resistance, why not contrast it with a Dark Side ceremony for the lost leader of the First Order?

For one thing, this sets up an interesting emotional conundrum for Kylo Ren/Ben Solo, who would use a Snoke memorial to cement his position as Supreme Leader -- but may also have felt his mother's passing via the Force connection that prevented him from trying to kill her in The Last Jedi.

Cutting back and forth between the two scenes would also give us an instant visual contrast with the relative size and power of the First Order in the social order of the galaxy, something the trilogy has so far failed to do. The First Order still doesn't quite seem real in the way the Empire did.

Most importantly, some brief funeral oratory would solve one common complaint about The Last Jedi-- that Snoke died, killed by Kylo Ren (though he blamed Rey), without us ever having the slightest understanding of who he was or how he came to found the First Order. If that's it for Snoke explanations, it does seem an awful waste of a character.

Lucasfilm could get away with never explaining Snoke on screen. What seems more likely is that they'd confine the story of his life to a spin-off novel (I'd give better than even odds such a narrative is already in the works).

Still, just a few lines of Snoke origin eulogy from Kylo Ren would be enough to give the film-only fans something to chew on -- and justify his existence in the sequel trilogy.

Problem: Rey's parents

It's not exactly a problem plot-wise: InThe Last Jedi, Kylo Ren explained what Rey had apparently always known, that her parents were junk traders who sold her off for drinking money and are now "in a pauper's grave on Jakku."

But many fans, some among them who championed fan theories for years (Rey's a Skywalker! Rey's a Kenobi! Rey's a clone of Emperor Palpatine!), feel that this is open-ended: Kylo might have been lying, after all. His avowed intention was to get her to "kill the past" and join him in ruling the galaxy. Never trust anyone on the Dark Side!

SEE ALSO: 'The Last Jedi' gave us the perfect answer to the question of Rey's parents

That isn't the intention of the movie. Rian Johnson is clearly aiming to venerate "nobodies" who are strong with the Force, like Rey, as the most important potential heroes of the Resistance. (Maybe you missed that whole coda with the slave kid and the broom? If you think that scene was about that specific kid alone, you're still not getting the point of it.)

Still, to bring a measure of closure for her character as well as for the fans, it would be great to see Rey taking a quick trip back to Jakku -- an echo of the fact that Luke and Anakin both revisited Tatooine once they'd grown up in their respective trilogies.

Not only would she be able to find the pauper's grave in question, officially mourn her past and move on, Rey could also finally have it out with stingy junkyard owner Unkar "one quarter portion" Plutt.

Problem: Luke's ghost

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Come on: of course Luke is coming back, if only for for a cameo or two.

His body vanished exactly the way Obi-Wan did in Star Warsand Yoda did in Return of the Jedi. That suggests strongly that, like both of those characters, he was suffused with enough knowledge of the Force that he was able to transform into a Force ghost after death.

Our natural expectation, then, is that Luke will appear to the kid he reluctantly trained -- Rey. And sure, if J.J. Abrams wants a visual retread of Obi-Wan's scenes from Empireand Jedi, that's what will happen.

But Rian Johnson embedded a few hints in The Last Jedithat Luke's ghost will appear to someone rather less willing to see them: Supreme Leader Kylo Ren.

During their monumental showdown at the end of the movie, Luke warns that he'll always be around to haunt him "if you strike me down" -- a thing Kylo certainly attempts to do. When the Force projection finally fades, Luke tells Kylo: "See you around, kid."

J.J. Abrams is too much of a popular storyteller to resist pulling on that thread. The irritable emo Supreme Leader being constantly haunted by a light-side Force ghost no one else can see? This is Star Wars gold, Jerry. Star Wars gold.

Not to mention the fact that Episode IX would then fit nicely into the long history of epics that have made hay from this kind of antagonistic beyond-the-grave interaction, from Macbethand Hamleton down.

Problem: No one alive from the original trilogy

Pending final discussions at Lucasfilm, Episode IX may well be the last movie in what we've traditionally known as the Star Wars saga. Rian Johnson's upcoming trilogy will take us somewhere entirely new, and the anthology movies are designed to fill in some of the gaps.

So it feels a little deflating that with Carrie Fisher's passing, none of the original leads will be alive to represent them the final movie of the series -- in the flesh, that is. (Sorry, Mark Hamill.)

But wait. There is one main character from the original trilogy that Lucasfilm has thus far been holding back -- a guy who made a deal that got worse all the time, before redeeming himself and destroying the second Death Star. A guy who's about to appear, albeit played by a younger actor, in the upcoming spin-off Solo.

Hello, Episode IX, what have we here?

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

---

Featured Video For You

---

If you've never seen 'Star Wars' before, you're not alone

---

Topics Star Wars