【family Archives】

The family ArchivesCEO of Chinese electronics maker Huawei raised eyebrows this week when he publicly trashed smartwatches.

“I am always confused as to what smartwatches are for when we have smartphones,” Eric Xu Zhijun said, adding that he would never ever wear one himself -- despite the fact that his own company makes them.

That may strike some as cold but his words should serve as a much-needed reality check to anyone still laboring under the delusion that they can persuade the general populace that wearing tiny touch displays on their wrists is the way of the future.

In fact, it's high time we admit what Zhijun likely already knows: smartwatches are doomed.

SEE ALSO: Retro tech is huge right now because the present is a depressing nightmare

It wasn't always supposed to be this way. Less than three years ago analysts were predicting the industry would be on fire.

The Apple Watch was going to usher in a new era of smartwatches. Pebble, one of the original Kickstarter success stories, was soaring. Tech pundits were breathlessly awaiting Android Wear and insisting that sharing your heartbeat with an Apple Watch was going to be the new sexting.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Except, of course, it wasn't.

Cut to the present and Pebble is deader than the ashes of a burned up Galaxy Note7. Fitbit, the most popular wearable brand, can't get its first real smartwatch out the door (and, by all accounts, it's so ugly no one will want one when they do). Android Wear is a buggy, fractured, mess and even Apple, which is reportedly selling more smartwatches than anyone else, still won't say how many Apple Watches it has sold (not surprising when sales in the low two digits is a market leader.)

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

But those are all symptoms of the bigger problem with smartwatches, the one that no one is talking about: watches, plain old analog watches, are dying a slow death and they are taking their "smart" counterparts down with them.

If you'd rather use your phone over a watch then what good is a smaller, buggier, version on your wrist?

I've never regularly worn a watch in my life. I'm not alone. Fewer and fewer people, especially young people, are wearing watches, according to analysts. In fact, chances are good that if you're a millennial, your smartphone is your main timepiece -- a trend that seems unlikely to reverse.

Now, I'm not saying that all watches are going to die any time soon. Watches will no doubt continue to be a mainstay in offices, courtrooms, schools, hospitals, and anywhere else smartphones aren't readily accessible for the foreseeable future. (Or at least until we get the augmented reality contact lenses we keep being promised.)

But even that doesn't bode well for smartwatches. If you'd rather use your phone over a watch then what good is a smaller, buggier, version on your wrist? And if you'd rather have a real, old school retro analog watch, why would you ever choose a more expensive smartwatch that will become obsolete months after you buy it?

Face it: Huawei's Zhijun was spot on. Smartwatches just don't add up.

---

Featured Video For You

---

This device can help 22 million Americans sleep better at night

---

Topics Apple Watch Smartwatches Gadgets

• Science
• Deals
• Tech
• Digital Culture
• Games
• Shopping
• Social Good
• Life

• GPU Availability and Pricing Update: April 2022
• Wind power is now the top clean energy source in the U.S.
• J. G. Ballard’s Brilliant, Not “Good” Writing by Tom McCarthy
• Citroën Cactus by Holly Connolly
• Donald Trump talked about space and Buzz Aldrin's face says it all
• Teetering Canaries by Judith Schalansky
• Child Reading by Timmy Straw
• Fall Books: Zadie Smith, Moyra Davey, and Maya Binyam Recommend by The Paris Review
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for January 28, 2025
• The Church Van by Caleb Gayle

• Learning to Ice
• Passion, Jealousy, Love, and an Unquestionable Disdain for Art by Olivia Kan
• Rabelaisian Enumerations: On Lists by Andrew Hui
• 'Plus One': Maya Erskine and Jack Quaid's undersung rom
• Making of a Poem: Emily Osborne on “Cruel Loss of Sons” by Emily Osborne
• Making a Claim on Language: A Conversation with Adania Shibli by Max Weiss
• Glimmer: In Siena by Cynthia Zarin
• Dyson Airstrait deal: $100 off for Best Buy Plus & Total members
• Accurate Models of Reality by Sophie Haigney and Olivia Kan
• NYT's The Mini crossword answers for February 9

• Trump's foreign aid freeze halts funding for digital diplomacy bureau
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for February 1
• Paul Bowles in Tangier by Frederic Tuten
• Tim Cook says big Apple AI announcement is coming later this year
• Amazon Kindle Paperwhite Kids: $139.99 at Amazon
• 'Shortcomings' review: Messy, rock
• The Paris Review’s Favorite Books of 2023 by The Paris Review
• SpaceX aborts rocket launch seconds before liftoff, but may still fly Sunday
• Will Oracle take over TikTok? Trump says he'll make a decision in 30 days
• Why Google's Valentine's Day game is a lot darker than you think

• Best iPad deal: Save $70 on 10th Gen Apple iPad
• The United Arab Emirates wants to build a city on Mars
• Syllabus: Unexpected Dramaturgy by Lynn Nottage
• A Fall Dispatch from the Review’s Poetry Editor by Srikanth Reddy
• Best Presidents' Day deal: Save $250 on Peloton Bike
• The Church Van by Caleb Gayle
• Google Bard now has an AI image generator with digital watermarking
• The United Arab Emirates wants to build a city on Mars
• Tips for Playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for February 1