A California law firm has filed a class-action lawsuit against OpenAI for "stealing" personal data to train ChatGPT.
Clarkson Law Firm,Russia in a complaint filed in the Northern District of California court on Wednesday, alleges ChatGPT and Dall-E "use stolen private information, including personally identifiable information, from hundreds of millions of internet users, including children of all ages, without their informed consent or knowledge." To train its large language model, OpenAI scraped 300 billion words from the internet, including personal information and posts from social media sites like Twitter and Reddit. The law firm claims OpenAI "did so in secret, and without registering as a data broker as it was required to do under applicable law."
SEE ALSO: Lawyers fined $5K for using ChatGPT to file lawsuit filled with fake casesOpenAI has been the subject of controversy for how and what data it collects to train and further develop ChatGPT. Until recently, there was no explicit way for users to opt out of letting OpenAI use their conversations and personal information to feed the model. ChatGPT was initially banned in Italy, using Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), for inadequately protecting user data, especially when it comes to minors. This lawsuit includes OpenAI's opaque privacy policies for existing users, but largely focuses on data scraped from the web that was never explicitly intended to be shared with ChatGPT. Through billion-dollar investments from Microsoft and subscriber revenue for ChatGPT Plus, OpenAI has profited from this data without compensating its source.
The 15 counts in the complaint include violation of privacy, negligence for failing to protect personal data, and larceny by illegally obtaining massive amounts of personal data to train its models. Datasets like Common Crawl, Wikipedia, and Reddit, which include personal information, are publicly available as long as companies follow the protocols for purchase and use of this data. But OpenAI allegedly used this data without permission or consent of users in the context of ChatGPT. Even though people's personal information is public on social media sites, blogs, and articles, if data is used outside of the intended platform, it can be considered a violation of privacy.
In Europe, there's a legal distinction between public domain and free-to-use data thanks to the GDPR law, but in the US, that's still up for debate. Nader Henein, a privacy research VP at Gartner who thinks the sentiment of the lawsuit is valid, said, "People should have control as to how their data is used, even when it is available in the public domain." But Henein is unsure if the US legal system would agree.
Ryan Clarkson, managing partner said in the firm's blog post, it's critical to act now with existing laws instead of waiting for Executive and Judicial branches to respond with federal regulation. "We cannot afford to pay the cost of negative outcomes with AI like we’ve done with social media, or like we did with nuclear. As a society, the price we would all pay is far too steep."
Topics Privacy ChatGPT
Previous:Administering Evil
'The Crown' won't cover Prince Harry & Meghan Markle's latest developmentsTikTok's list of community guidelines just got way bigger2020 winter theater preview: Armie Hammer, Bobby Cannavale, and moreDid you know you shouldn't feed ducks bread? These people didn't.NBA road teams are winning more because of dating apps. No, really.'90 Day Fiancé' is the best reality show on TV right nowLime lays off dozens and pulls eCritics who called out Chelsea Clinton for 'Lifetime Impact Award' made one large errorWatch this woman flub her Canadian 'Family Feud' answer in the most iconic wayTwitter will test reply limiting feature to beat back trollsAdele freaks out midReddit bests Facebook by rolling out a superior deepfakes policy2020 winter theater preview: Armie Hammer, Bobby Cannavale, and moreStreaming service Quibi will launch with more than 175 new showsInstagram just launched new TikTok — ahem, Boomerang — effects'90 Day Fiancé' is the best reality show on TV right nowJoe Biden met a puppy named Biden and for a moment, the entire world stoppedSerena Williams and Roger Federer to play in Australian bushfire charity matchMemes don't just look good on the internet, they also look good on your eyelidsUberEATS is delivering alcohol now, but probably not in the way you were hoping Staff Picks: Fat Ladies, Flowers, and Faraway Lands by The Paris Review 'Fallen Leaves' review: Finding love in a hopeless place Staff Picks: Pranks, Prints, and Penises Foul Matter Henry Green Is As Good As His Word What Once Was Lost: Unfinding and Refinding Music History Here's why 'Dream Scenario' pays tribute to the Talking Heads 35+ headphone deals from Amazon's Black Friday sale Mistaken Self Writing a Memoir of Difficult Women 'Thanksgiving' review: Eli Roth's latest is a gore snore Black Friday Amazon Echo deals 2023 Everything that's broken on Twitter right now, from video plays to follower counts Viral app Retro Pod removed from Apple's app store Seattle Public Schools files lawsuit against TikTok, Instagram, and more How to watch UNC vs. Clemson football livestreams: kickoff time, streaming deals, and more Suitcase Full of Candy: An Interview with Svetlana Alexievich Dear Lynda: Fickle Secret Admirers and Knowing the Ending by Lynda Barry Love and Badness in America and the Arab World by Diya Abdo The Macaron That Tastes Like Marina Abramovic